2 Comments
User's avatar
Lawrence Serewicz's avatar

Once someone is aware of grave abuses like those revealed in the Epstein files, deliberately refusing to care or to form any judgment is itself a moral choice. In a decent society, we do not treat such abuse as a neutral matter; we recognise it as wrong and, at minimum, refuse to collude in minimising it. While not everyone must speak publicly, a wilful refusal to engage even when asked tends to function, in practice, as a form of abdication and helps create a climate in which such wrongs are more easily ignored.

Jay Caruso's avatar

I get what you're saying, Lawerence, and thanks for the comment. That said, as I pointed out, there is a vast chasm between empathy and anxiety. And I don't see it as neutral. I think it is awful what happened to those girls, and I think anyone involved should be prosecuted if the evidence exists or if the statute of limitations has passed, shut out of polite society. My position is that not caring means I do not have to indulge in the daily cycle that comes out, and take part in the public, political fights that have dominated since their release. Not caring means I won't become emotionally invested in it.